On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 19:58, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:44, "David Palmer." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 07:04, Russell Coker wrote: > > > Please point out where the Adamantix developers expressed a willingness > > > to help in any way. > > That message was intentionally to you not the list. Now we will have another > flame-war.
I'm sorry, but I didn't even notice. I did note that the reply was addressed to you, but changed it without thinking, because I am always careful to reply to the list. I don't think of anything else because I never disguise anything I do unless I am up against an enemy, and I did not think that this was the scenario here. > > I searched the Debian-devel archive for the exchanges I read myself, but > > do you think that I could find them? No way! > > They must be there somewhere, but time is short, so I grabbed this off > > the Adamantix site. > > I think that it adequately displays Peter Bussers' attitude. I picked Peters' name off the site because it was the one I remembered from the debian-devel thread. Frankly I notice no disparity between what he expressed then and what he has expressed on the site. > > The web site does not seem to match Peter's actions. I will contact him and inquire about intention in order to establish what the situation is. I see absolutely no justification for a flamewar. May I enquire as to the issue(s) involved? Regards, David.
