Le mardi 02 décembre 2003 à 17:19:22, Tom a écrit: > Smartcards would have avoided the Debian compromise: merely having a > compromised DD box would have prevented bad guy from getting on the box
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Russell Coker
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Artur R. Czechowski
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Andreas Schuldei
- RE: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Julian Mehnle
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Russell Coker
- OT: smart card/USB dongle solution Ludovic Rousseau
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system... Wouter Verhelst
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system... Ludovic Rousseau
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk system... Matt Zimmerman
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Tom
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Matt Zimmerman
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Tom
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Colin Watson
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Tom
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Russell Coker
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Tom
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Patrick Ouellette
- Re: Backport of the integer overflow in the brk s... Russell Coker
