On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:12:36 -0500, christophe barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I don't see why adding a md5dsum_are_mandatory clause to the debian
> policy would be difficult (what would be a good reason to not add
> md5sum to a package?).
Because it buys little security wise? Because there are
solutions one can put in place today that offer better coverage than
in package md5sums?
manoj
--
In an age when the fashion is to be in love with yourself, confessing
to be in love with somebody else is an admission of unfaithfulness to
one's beloved. Russell Baker
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
