-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Duck, perhaps you should have written the ITP earlier. Instead of > complaining, why don't you thank your fellow developer and offer to > co-maintain the package. Perhaps the package could benefit from your > combined efforts. > As Martin Pitt said, I think it's wise contacting related persons, look at the program, and then, when you relly want to package it, write an ITP. I won't post hundreds of ITPs in advance to be sure to get the packages i like and then reopen them when i don't those. I said i contacted people, looked à the program, but i didn't package anything. My ITP so came just before any real packaging work, and i don't think doing it earlier would have been adequate. I don't think this "fellow developer" wants to share HIS package with anybody. And i don't think i'd like to work with a guy who is unable to communicate. I was just complaining about his behavior, i don't mind having this package or not. I've got enought packages to deal with, i just wanted to help the gnome packaging team (Sebastien Bacher is actually my sponsor) because this nice program was missing. Duck -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/t3hCsczZcpAmcIYRAtGaAJ9fc/EZuub23Df4/gVAw579nRt3XwCeJXi/ ngTtikWG7tFbuyHXj4020zA= =ngvk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
