* Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-13 05:00]: > As for the DAM, i wander why an AM racommends an applicant, but the > DAM does not accept him. What does this mean? Is AM role relevant or > in effect DAM is the real one who decides? If the latter, why > haveing AM?
Of course the DAM is the one who makes the decision; after all, he's the only one with the authority to make the decision (read the constitution). The AM prepares a report which the DAM uses to form a decision, but he doesn't necessarily have to form the same conclusions as the AM. Also note that the DAM's decision can be overridden. > As you can see, this has nothing to deal with popular or unpopular > decision. Right, just take Eray as an example (and note that the NM committee agreed 100% with the DAM's decision; yet the DAM got all the blame). -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
