On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:10:02PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Apparently you forget about a specific part of the Social Contract. > (Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software...)
I have a creepy feeling that you are not wearing a user hat but rather a hat of an organisation with a specific agenda. The current compromise of splitting gimp/gimp-nonfree is not ideal, but it's temporary measure anyway.. > > . And given that you appear to have a religious objection > Does this assertion have any ground? Nobody but a religous nut would claim that providing a Suggests: link to software that is free (except for some parts of world) is evil. > Sure, keep lowering the quality of Debian in matter of freedom, > there's no matter discussing that. Sure, keep lowering the quality of debian-devel mailing list in matter or signal/noise ratio, If everyone of the 1784 list members used 1 minute reading your rants, we've just lost 4 workdays of creating a better debian. Please provide patches, not flames. Some contructive suggestions: 1) Eat some icecream and cool down. 2) Just wait until dust settles around lzw. 3) Add non-lzw gif saving support to gimp. 4) Patch apt-listchanges so that id doesn't mail about suggestions on packages that are not available. -- Riku Voipio | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | kirkkonummentie 33 | +358 40 8476974 --+-- 02140 Espoo | | dark> A bad analogy is like leaky screwdriver |
