On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:19:03AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Agreed, so why rename it at all? (ie why t1lib -> libt1 if the dummy > package is always going to be required anyway).
Not always; just for one Debian release. A dummy package just *smooths* upgrades if you do them right; it doesn't render them impossible. > > What's wrong with libt1-dev? Do you expect to have to support > > development against multiple versions of t1lib? > > Apparently so. Well, he's since followed up and said he won't have to. -- G. Branden Robinson | You can have my PGP passphrase when Debian GNU/Linux | you pry it from my cold, dead [EMAIL PROTECTED] | brain. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Adam Thornton
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
