A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Daniel Jacobowitz a következőeket írta: > > <insert usual rant about new users that start with unstable deserving > what they get> > > No, really. This is what stable and testing releases are for.
I fully agree. But... When I tell it to my friends, some say that stable is way too old for them. In these cases I used to think about how the release cycle could be shortened. (I am also thinking about this thing when we talk about the kernel...) In theory it would be possible to state only one or two release goals, announcing feature freeze shortly after stable is out, and some draconian rules for deep freeze would help. If one knows that the next window to put new features in is close, and even if the release goals are clear for two or more next stable releases, it would be easier to behave seriously both for the maintainer who is eager to stick new nifty features in, and the user who wants to use them. This is IMHO. And what is your opinion? -- GNU GPL: csak tiszta forrásból
