On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:32:35 +1000, Anthony Towns > <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > >> Is there a recommended way to handle this? > >Yeah: don't ship symlinks in the package; generate them later. > Is example code available to imitate conffile handling?
For symlinks? I doubt it. There are two things to worry about: one is where the symlink points, and the other is what it's called. sysvinit's symlinks don't generally change where they point, but do change what they're called (S30 -> K20 eg). I don't think renames like that are something you can reasonably handle in a conffile-esque manner. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Australian DMCA (the Digital Agenda Amendments) Under Review! -- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/copyright/digitalagenda
