I've noticed there's quite a few almost-empty packages lurking in the archive, whose sole purpose seems to be to download non-free software and install it on a users' systems.
I don't like the fact that these seem to be (randomly) scattered over main and contrib. Although the installer packages themselves certainly are Free, I feel the social contract is being violated when I have main and contrib in my sources.list file, but after having completed the installation of a package from these sections, non-free software is installed on my system. Here's a quick list of suspected packages: vtkdata-installer optional acl-installer contrib/devel acl-pro-installer contrib/devel atokx contrib/utils daemontools-installer contrib/misc djbdns-installer contrib/net f-prot-installer contrib/utils flashplugin-nonfree optional hyperspec optional ibm-jdk1.1-installer contrib/devel int-fiction-installer contrib/games lw-per-installer contrib/devel lw-pro-installer contrib/devel msttcorefonts contrib/graphics nvidia-kernel-src contrib/x11 nvidia-glx-src contrib/x11 qmailanalog-installer contrib/mail quake2-data contrib/games roxen-ssl contrib/web roxen2-ssl contrib/web sdic-edict contrib/text sdic-gene95 contrib/text setiathome contrib/misc realplayer net I've not verified all of these being such installer packages for non-free software, nor do I claim it to be complete. Just to give you a rough idea. Also, they're of different nature -- some install the non-free software from their post-installation scripts, while others install a script in /usr/sbin/ which will do the installation of the non-free software when run. I'd like to submit bugs on these, asking them to move to non-free. So consider this email an invitation to discussion before a mass-bug filing. If the list agrees that bugs are warranted, which severity should I use? In my opinion it's a violation of the social contract and thus serious, but I've been recently told I should probably not use my own opinion as a justification for using the RC levels, so mayhaps wishlist would be better? -- Tore Anderson