Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So what you were saying is, the package could not be built from source > correctly anyway, and he only fixed one of the two bugs?
Right. (Emphasis on "correctly" -- the build did nominally succeed.) > That's an independant bug; why was it not filed when g++ 3 became the > default? Good question. Lameness? At any rate, I have uploaded an -11.2 which should (I think...) restore sanity and keep -11.1 from making it out of incoming. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
