On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:25:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > >glibc is even worse. It has multiple maintainers, and they still don't > >have enough time to chase down all the important bugs, let alone > >insignificant ones like this. > > This is unfortunately true; glibc seems to be severely broken on a > routine basis upstream. Kinda makes me want a new, freshly written C > library, but that's not an easy prospect. :-)
*opens mouth* *closes mouth* *goes back to trying to purge NetBSD of 4-clause BSD licenses so that the netbsd-libc and netbsd-kernel-source-* packages will be free and clear* Only 10,000 files now... (hey, it *was* 15,000). -- Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpue2Q7xC6Kw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
