On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:06:39PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:23:17 +0100 > Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:27:00AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: > > > Because you think it's an awesome group with laudable goals and you > > > want to contribute? > > > TBH, that's a lousy reason to join Debian. Send a cheque or something. > > *cough* Oh, right, we should hate Debian, loathe it before joining, > right?
Do you have difficulty with English? That is not what I said. > > I'm not sure there are any good ones other than having some specific > > (technical, not political) things you want to see done and are willing > > to do. In that case, you won't have to be told to demonstrate stuff - > > you'll just do it, because you want to. > > Bull. Do you know how many times people with d.o accounts will blast > others to "do something!" Obviously this isn't enough yet it seems like > Debian doesn't want to encourage people who want to do the rarest of things... > contribute. And that doesn't make any sense; what are you talking about? My whole point is that Debian does not need people who need encouraging. We need people who will do the work *without* encouragement, mostly because they ain't going to get any. If you are attempting to suggest that people should be given accounts as a form of encouragement, then there are two problems with this idea: 1) It's insane. This is not a club. 2) It only works once. Those people will be "encouraged" for about a week, then they'll go MIA, because they won't get any more ego boosters. Which is why we don't need them. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
pgp5DzlQAIpIX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
