* Noah L. Meyerhans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030806 19:20]: > In fact, I believe the whole DAM > process would be more effective if we *required* that you made > non-trivial contributions to Debian *before* the DAM would create an > account for you.
I second. At cleaning up wnpp I saw more than once mass filled ITPs by a person hoping to get DD (the last is only assuming), and that were then retitled by QA any time later and are now about to be closed. It's IMHO not the optimal way to get a DD in filling two ITPs, uploading both packages and then expect to become a DD immediatly. > Additionally (strictly my opinion here, others will undoubtedly > disagree), I believe that Debian's long release times are caused by it > being too big, rather than not big enough. Mostly true. It's true for the next web immage gallery, but if someone is adding e.g. a language teaching software this would really be a good contribution. (I'm not speaking in opposit to adding another web image galery. But if the galery has any non-trivial bugs I personally would encourage developers to work on other items, and rather drop the code, except it has addworthy features compared to all other programms. However, as long as anyone volunteers to keep the package in a good state, and it doesn't put burden on debian, it's ok to keep it.) Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
