Em Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT), Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > You can't get there from here, I think. Unix admins coming to Debian > > will scream blue murder if it starts being "/My Variable Data/Logs", and > > that group is important to us. > > Note that there is at least one project which is looking at doing exactly > that while retaining backwards compatability (GoboLinux). It may be worth, > on the long term, looking at how it may be possible to migrate from > obscure paths like "/opt", "/bin", "/sbin", "/usr/bin", etc, to more > sensible names, in that way. They had a presentation on the IV Free Software International Forum in Porto Alegre (Brazil) this year and I can assure you I didn't hear a lot of good things about this (I didn't actually attend to the thing, but other DD's did). It seems like a mess of symlinks and they say it doesn't need 'package management' when it actually has a bunch of scripts to handle the symlink 'farm' they grow on /usr/bin and such. Doesn't seem like a clean solution to me, no no no... It also seems like they want to have each package installed in its own directory, which I think sucks tremendously... I hated that when I lived with windows... I always wanted to have all my binaries in the PATH, etc. And the real end user does not even care about that. I don't really care about /. I think path abstraction should be achieved by graphical file management utilities like Nautilus, not by messing with something that's actually working, to then cause more problems. []s! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov> Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org> Dúvidas sobre o Debian? Visite o Rau-Tu: http://rautu.cipsga.org.br
