On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:59:20AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Yeah. That was the whole reason I was trying to get a copy of 2.4.20 > compiled with gcc 2.95. I didn't know if it was the compiler or the newer > version of the kernel that had the problem. I just knew that my problems > started with the newer version. If 2.4.20 is stable for 2 weeks I'll > move it to my "stable" boot option, compile 2.4.21 w/gcc 2.95 and install it > as the current and give it a whirl.
2.4.21 built with gcc 2.95 has been rock solid for me. -- - mdz
