Keegan Quinn wrote: > FWIW, I've had very good experiences with the CUPS in unstable, so > I'd not object to this. OTOH, installing it without it being 'default' > is already quite trivial. What would this change entail, exactly?
Probably making the print server task install it instead of lpr, which would have a side effect of making sure it's on CD#1 if it's not already. Probably also demoting the lpr package to optional and moving cups from there to standard. Possibly making lsb depend on part of cups instead of lpr. -- see shy jo, following this discussion with interest and his tasksel hat on
pgppk4AHwmPay.pgp
Description: PGP signature