On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 07:44:06PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> "Packages MUST NOT use virtual package names (except privately, amongst
> a cooperating group of packages) unless they have been agreed upon and
> appear in this list."
Note that the exception ("except privately...") is large enough to
drive a truck through! :)
But yeah, I have no problem with this name. It seems well-formed,
consistent with existing practice, and doesn't conflict with anything
else I'm aware of, and, AFAIK, those are really the only valid reasons
for objecting to a proposed virtual package name.
--
Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
