Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am still wating for Adam patches (it's been a while). However, I do not > want to change it from a draft into a official policy. I just want to add > it to the DDP website documentation and mark it _there_ as a draft. The > fact that it's not even listed in the DDP website reduces it usefulness.
That's fine with me. > So, I was basicly asking (probably wrongly worded) to: > > a) add a link to the draft from w.d.o/doc/ddp (currently hidden under > w.d.o/doc/docpolicy) > > b) add it to the list of developers' manuals (w.d.o/doc/index and > w.d.o/doc/devel-manuals) > > Of course, I'm not going to change it's status. It will still be called a > 'draft' but it will be given wider exposure. Few people (as demonstrated by > the discussion at -devel and the fact that people at -legal are not aware > of the license section) are aware that we are drafting a policy for > documentation in the Debian project. Seems ok to me. > > Did Adam indicated he stopped doing rewrite of ddp-policy? Did I miss > > something? (Sorry for my long absense from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > No he did not, but still, there have been few updates of the document > itself (and I did tell Adam to go ahead and hack it as needed) I've been working on a branch of it actually. I had serious problems with the *scope* of the policy -- it seemed to be more extensive and detailed in places than it needed to be. I have a pretty bad backlog of stuff going on right now. -- ...Adam Di Carlo...<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
