On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 08:51:27PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > > > Could the dh_undocumented programm allways fail with an error "Don't > > > use me" as the next step? That way all new uploads will be forced to > > > care. > > > > this will still create fail to build bugs for no good reason. > > Some sort of "Hey you, your doing something wrong but I will let is > pass this time" feedback from autobuilder would be nice together with > keeping such nearly broken packages out of testing (to give some > incentive for mainatiner to fix the problem).
They are *not* "nearly broken". They are just out of date by a few months. Why this urge to break compatibility? What useful purpose does it serve? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
