Hi On Thursday 03 July 2003 19:37, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Julien LEMOINE wrote: > > Secondly, to reply to every person who thinks I should have created a > > more "user friendly" migration who did not break backwards compatibility. > > My answer is that I have no time to implement command line support for > > stunnel 4.x. > > Yes. But you still have the options of: > - Publically asking if someone else has time and skill to do it. > - Putting off the update and/or packaging the interface incompatible > stunnel under a new name.
Yes, this is a good solution. It is a little too late now but I will use this method for the next problem of this kind. > > Finally, since there is not really a policy about when to use debconf, > > I will respect the DFSG [1] and add a debconf warning [2] in the > > stunnel package. > > There is a difference between the social contract and the DFSG. > > As a user of stunnel: Your warning will not help me as it does not keep > stunnel from breaking. *Not* installing a totally incompatible program > where the stunnel I wanted when I said "apt-get install stunnel" would. I did not upload it. Best Regards. -- Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue
