On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:12:02PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:54:00AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > > > If they are not software, then under clause one of the Social Contract, > > they don't belong in debian. > > > > This has been debated several thousand times on -legal... > > I don't recall a consensus that software documentation does not belong in > Debian.
That's because there wasn't one. But if one wishes to partition the stuff in Debian main into "software" and "non-software", one will need to amend the Social Contract to discuss how we handle, and what standards we apply to, non-software. The Debian Social Contract says "Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software". If there are things "in Debian" that are "not free" or "not software", then we may be violation of our guiding principles. -- G. Branden Robinson | Humor is a rubber sword - it allows Debian GNU/Linux | you to make a point without drawing [EMAIL PROTECTED] | blood. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Mary Hirsch
pgpAXnxhqvkfz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
