On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 06:01:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Or else, if the standards are not free, let them in non-free. We're not
> going to let non-free documents enter main just because they are called
> RFC's or W3C recommendations.
Yet we let them in because they are called licenses. And no, I'm not
asking to be able to change the _contract_ between the copyright owner
and the licensee. I'm talking about the file. I'm talking about this:
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of
this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
It doesn't get any more non-free than that, does it?
Marcelo
