On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 17:53, Michał Politowski wrote: > It looks like > a) possible GPL incompatibility - so no distribution would be possible at all, > b) even if not, no paying distribution means non-free IMHO.
I see your point. But I think it should be resolvable. Since that part of the clause covers part of the code from CAML Light. And we all know the CAML Light descendents O'CAML is perfect Free Software. And since Moscow ML authors put their own work, major part of Moscow ML in GPL itself, so I dare to say both parts are good supporters of Free Software. :) I think it's resolvable. If nobody will contact them, I'll contact them after awhile about the license issue. But since I'm not a native English speaker nor .dk nor .fr speaker, I'd rather hope someone else could approach the authors of Moscow ML representing Debian. Anyone? :) -- ZHAO Wei [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/zhaoway/ Linux & Free Software Consultant, Nanjing, China
