John Goerzen wrote:
As I say this, I'm sure people can say the same about i486 and even i386 machines. Why exactly do we need to remove this support?
Read the bug report with the number you put in your Subject.
Regards, Martin
- Re: Bug#198158: architec... Emile van Bergen
- Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn... Herbert Xu
- Bug#198158: architecture i386... Branden Robinson
- Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn... Adam Borowski
- Bug#198158: architecture i386... Marcelo E. Magallon
- Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn... Christoph Hellwig
- Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymo... Sven Luther
- Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 ... Arnaud Vandyck
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 a... Erwan MAS
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i... GOTO Masanori
- Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 anymo... "Martin v. Löwis"
- Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 ... John Goerzen
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 a... "Martin v. Löwis"
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i... Andreas Barth
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn... Thomas Viehmann
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn... David Weinehall
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i386 a... "Martin v. Löwis"
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn't i... Adam Heath
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386... Adam Warner
- Re: Bug#198158: architecture i386 isn... David Schleef
