Colin Walters dijo [Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:18:27AM -0400]: > > I have read this standard again and again and I have trouble to > > see how far it is relevant to the Debian menu system: > > Primarily because the rest of the world has settled on the .desktop > format as the standard for menus. The whole idea with .desktop was to > supplant the myriad incompatible menu systems used by various > distributors. > > Third party software developers nowadays are going to be writing > .desktop files, and dropping them in /usr/share/applications. I doubt > that very many at all are going to go to the trouble of learning > Debian's menu system and writing an additional menu entry for it. > > And more and more upstream packages are coming with .desktop files now; > why should I have to write a Debian menu file when my package comes with > a perfectly good .desktop menu file?
I am not too sure I want this... One of the great things about our menu system is that it complies with a rather logical policy - menus are not overly nested. I don't know how is the .desktop format, but I understand it is just that - a format. I really doubt it provides the coherency of Debian's menu system - Imagine, for example, a developer files his browser in Apps/Browsers instead of Apps/Net - What can we do about it? We can not even file a bug. He will probably not care about our complaint, as he does not need to abide by any policy for HIS work. Menu systems, IMHO, are the task of a distribution - a way to organize a collection of software. They should not be the task of individual developers. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
