On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:19:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long > > as I have been aware. See the security team FAQ. > > deb http://mirror.pacific.net.au/debian-security/ stable/updates main > > > Do you honestly think would be a good idea to use testing-security this way > > on a continual basis? > > Yes, I do. I think we should release DSA's for security problems in > testing, too. > > > Such an endeavor would not seem to require any of the > > facilities which make foo-security different from foo{,-proposed-updates}. > > The same applies to stable: the key differences are immediacy, > announcements and control, all of which are equally valuable for testing > as stable. In any event, testing-proposed-updates exists and works at > present, the only thing missing is people reliably uploading to it, and > evaluating whether uploads work well enough to be included in testing > or not. All the technical issues have already been addressed.
Are the testing-proposed-updates autobuilt on all arches ? I got the impression that this was not the case, but i may be wrong. Friendly, Sven Luther
