On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 01:30:38PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:04:10PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > > Why not? Testing would be my personal choice for running a desktop (or > > laptop) Linux, were I not otherwise involved with Debian development. > > The only bad thing is the non-existent security (I could live with > > occasional critical bug but the level of critical bugs in unstable is > > too much to bear for most users). There are, however, some pre-plans > > afoot regarding that (more or less running the same process as with > > stable, of course with different people responsible). > > What kind of pre-planning is taking place? The idea of security > updates for testing? > > Every time this appears to have been raised it's usually shot down > very quickly; unless I've missed something.
I haven't seen it be shot down. I've seen people saying "the infrastructure's there, it's just that nobody's actually doing the updates", though. However, I wasn't aware of any of the pre-plans Kalle refers to. I didn't think anyone had actually picked up this ball yet. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
