On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 21:37, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le sam 26/04/2003 Ã 02:59, Matthew Palmer a Ãcrit : > > For the original problem, it surely should be possible to build 386 and 486+ > > versions of libstdc++ and include both in the distro, with linker magic (or > > installer magic) to tell the difference? > > That would not be enough. We need specific versions of C++ applications > for 386. Of course, only a few should be enough : python, apt, groff... > but that is far from an empty list. That's why dropping i386 completely > and provide an i386 subset of the distribution seems reasonable.
Agreed. It seems to me though that we've just traded one problem (i386) for another: our poor archive categorization. How to define this distribution subset?
