Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Consider that an Evil Company, say, starting with the letter 'M', could
apparently make its changes to the documentation of a GFDL-licensed
document near-proprietary by adding invariant sections and cover texts
that are unconscionable to the original author. Something like an
invariant section on how the original author's coding style resembles
the intelligence of the infamous paper clip. And a cover text that
"Linux Sucks".
Why is this a problem? Seems to me that it is their right to do so, if
they make a contribution that nobody else wants to be without, they have
earned the moral right to insult the original author.
--
Hans