On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Yes, but it is better than having our packages hold back by libvorbis > and the 105 or so packages that will be breaken by its inclusion in > testing, many of them have big RC bugs and such, and will not be > includable in testing for a long time.
Could you please back your figures up with hard data? I was looking for libvorbis stuff to NMU and had a time finding some. clanlib-vorbis still needs porting though. I doubt we are talking about '105' packages though. And in the end, those packages are *already* included in testing, no? Just a/some version(s) behind. cheers, Michael
