On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:05:52PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > depth, i cannot help all that much about it, and libvorbis is a valid > > > > candidate, but his installation would break 107 or so packages in > > > > testing, and i have not really the intention to check by hand all those > > > > 107 packages. I believe it is just some packages that need to be rebuilt > > > > due to the libvorbis0a thingy, not sure though. I already checked the > > > > primary dependencies of all our packages (around 40) by hand, which > > > > > > apt-cache showpkg libvorbis0 prints out just a couple of packages. Is > > > > You have to look at the update_output.txt file, it shows : > > > * alpha: adonthell, alsaplayer, alsaplayer-alsa, alsaplayer-common, > [...] > > But these are also packages wich depend implicitely on libvorbis0, > right?
I suppose so, not sure though, as i have not checked in detail. > For example: > blackbird:~/tum/tum/ac1/report$ apt-cache show race | grep Depends > Depends: race-data (>= 0.7.0-5), clanlib2 (>= 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-gl (>= > 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-gui (>= 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-jpeg (>= 0.6.2-1), > clanlib2-png (>= 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-sound (>= 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-vorbis > (>= 0.6.2-1), libc6 (>= 2.2.5-13), libpng3, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 (>= > 1:2.95.4-0.010810), xlibmesa3 | libgl1, zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) > > clanlib2-vorbis probably depends on libvorbis0. Yes, and clanlib2-vorbis doesn't exist in sid anymore, but only libclan2-vorbis. > I guess wo only have to rebuild first-level dependencies, or am I > mistaken? You would have to rebuild all first-level dependencies, yes, and hope that those rebuilds don't introduce other bumped dependencies that have problems with testing. Friendly, Sven Luther
