Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:11:08AM +0000, James Troup wrote: > > Err, bullshit, there's doc/*.1.sgml and --help for most of the key > > scripts. > > [1106] [snoopy:unstable:bam] ~/cvswork/dak >helena --help
helena is not a key script. Try again. grep -lir 'Options\["help"\]' dak shows: amber, catherine, claire.py, charisma, fernanda.py, halle, heidi, jenna, jennifer, jeri, julia, lisa, kelly, madison, melanie, rhona, shania, ziyi All at least recognise help and that is IMNSHO more than most of the key scripts (and several less-than-key ones). > This seems to be common for all the programs I have tried so far. Sorry, don't believe you. See above. > How do you change it? Dinstall::OverrideMaintainer - see katie.conf.security. > Is it possible to just have it mail the uploader? No because in the Debian world (which includes queue daemons and buildds) it's not possible to sanely determine who the human uploader is. It'd be trivial to add if there was such a way in your environment. > errr.... I don't consider this to be Debian packaging: > > katie (0notforuse0-0) unstable; urgency=low > > * Initial non-release. [The packaging is nowhere near complete; don't > * bother trying to use it unaltered.] > > -- James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 25 Sep 2001 22:59:17 +0100 > > If this actually has been tested and does generate a valid package, > I stand corrected; but this comment makes it look like it never > has been tested. I find it strange that you take some comments (like the above) at more than there face value, yet can't even parse seemingly easier-to-understand comments like the one in cron.weekly. There is packaging; it produces a deb, but it's not perfect and so there's a disclaimer in there. And sorry but I still think you didn't even check. -- James
