Thomas Bushnell writes: > I believe at this point you are raising FUD. I believe I was attempting to discuss the subject calmly and rationally while avoiding inflammatory language such as "you are raising FUD".
> The license on Unicode explicitly grants permission to make such > derivatives, if they even are such, in free programs. Reference? I don't recall seeing this mentioned earlier in this thread, and it is not at all clear from a quick perusal of the copyright data on the Unicode site that the license for the file in question is DFSG-compliant. Could you tell me what I am missing? BTW the copy of the file on my system (installed by perl-modules) lacks the apparently required disclaimer. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI
