On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:25:26AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote: > Other comments in that thread include comments like "Hey, here's my > CFLAGS, ..." "... why won't half my apps work now (including even > gcc now)?" "... it might help you, george" (and george says "no, I > have a m68k and your CFLAGS has pentium options") "... now you can > all try it out", etc, etc. So there are people who don't understand > optimization issues yet. They are not deserving of epithets unless > they refuse to help themselves grow.
If we were to improve our current user-build mechanisms, would it be feasible for Debian source packages or a mirror to keep track of what flags are known to break what packages on what $ARCHs? It'd certainly make life easier for the compulsive builder. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau Computer Science & Student Representaive, UNSW * * # apt-get into it Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer * * <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0> <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0> * * GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1 9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgpLmaaF1DH5m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
