On 03 Sep 2002 11:58:10 -0700
Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What is the thinking behind always requiring libfoo-dev to depend on
> libbar-dev when libfoo depends on libbar? I understand the need when
> /usr/include/foo.h contains
>
> #include <bar.h>
So that libbar-dev can conflict with packages that libbar is incompatible
with at run-time, so that other shared libraries that are incompatible
do not get loaded in the same shared namespace.
Google, libpkg-guide.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
