Le Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 12:42:20PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum écrivait: > I also don't see a bug submitted with this. If you're submitting > NMU's, you sure as hell better be submitting bugs with patches (or > the fact that no patch is required other than rebuilding with an > updated system).
The NMUer has to send the patch of the NMU to the maintainer, either through the BTS or directly, yes. > Please delete your uploads. You are violating policy. Policy doesn't rule the NMUs. There's no rule for NMUs, just guidelines ... and the guideline during a BSP are "NMU without prior notification but upload to DELAYED in order to leave some time to the maintainer if he's not happy with the NMU". > For debian-devel: The NMU here was made to rebuild for perl 5.8; > no other changes would have been necessary. You should stop complaining about the NMU, the perl 5.8 upgrade has been announced twice on debian-deval-announce. If you were a good maintainer, you would already have uploaded a fixed package compiled against perl 5.8 and you wouldn't have had a single problem. So please ... don't complain about NMUers when they are only trying ot help you ! Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
