On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:09:18PM +0200, Luca Barbieri wrote: > > Of course there is. You upload new versions of the gcc 2.95 packages, > > and you make the new gcc 3.2 packages conflict with the old ones. > > Nothing is broken in that case. > False. > Users will no longer get updated version of any C++ package unless they > manually remove/recompile any package depending on the old libraries > which is not yet recompiled or is not in Debian. > > For example, how about calc.cx KDE 3.0 packages that are obviously > necessary for any KDE user? I don't see any mention of GCC 3.2 on their > text file so I assume that they aren't ported.
Why is KDE 3.0 obviously necessary for any KDE user? KDE 2.2.2 still works fine but will probably suffer from the same issue. However, I will rebuild against gcc 3.2 as soon as libfam/libqt gets rebuilt against it. Chris
