Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, since you neglected to supply the version numbers of the faulty > packages, I am unsure whether you're referring to an upload that didn't > make it into Sid today, or to razor 1.20-1. Should we all downgrade to > razor 1.19-1, or is that one okay? (It seems to be working, but you also > didn't tell us what the bad package's symptoms are, so I can't evaluate > this with certainty either.)
I think that it's razor 1.20-1. I was seeing the following in my logs after my morning update: Apr 17 08:53:11 pern spamd[17594]: undefined Razor::Client Apr 17 08:53:11 pern spamd[17594]: razor check skipped: undefined Razor::Client That went away after I disabled razor checks in my configs. I update from a non-official mirror, so my updates might be behind by a day or so. -- Dave Carrigan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | Yow! What I need is a MATURE UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-DNS | RELATIONSHIP with a FLOPPY Seattle, WA, USA | DISK... http://www.rudedog.org/ | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
