begin Gustavo Noronha Silva quotation: > Em Tue, 9 Apr 2002 14:26:39 +0300, Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > escreveu: > > > If the GFDL were a "free to use and modify" license, then we would not > > be having this discussion. The problem is that the GFDL specifies > > parts that we are _not_ free to modify, or even to delete. > > indeed, I would not like to see people modifying my points of view and > redistributing saying that's what I think, you see
Come off it. The license can specify that changes be identified without requiring that sections never be changed or removed. You might as well argue against the GPL on the grounds that someone might add a lot of stupid bugs into your program and then redistribute it, thus making you look like an incompetent programmer. This is why Section 2 of the GPL requires prominent notice of any changes made. I am less familiar with the GFDL, but I expect it includes a similar requirement. So leave the straw men out of this, please. (Though admittedly we might have less to discuss then.) Craig
pgpp09vHSdsXk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
