* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I agreed with the social contract, but I think it should be > changed. Some parts are just wrong, other things are confusing.
That certainly looks like a contradiction to me. How do you agree with
it if you feel it's wrong?
> To talk about the social contract, our priorities are free software
> and our users. Somebody is having problems with non-free
> software. What is wrong with telling him that the kind of problems
> he's having is normal with non-free software and say that there are 2
> free alternatives in Debian which would probably not have those
> problems?
Nothing is wrong with that. However, that isn't what you said.
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It's your own fault. You choosed to run non-free software, now you get
> the consequences. Debian doesn't support vmware, so go somewhere else
> with your vmware problems. (Debian does support plex86 and bochs, BTW)
That's the original message you sent which *is* wrong. Debian supports
its users regardless of if they run non-free software or not. In fact,
we specifically support their running of non-free software and we
provide infrastructure (such as our mailing lists) for them.
Stephen
pgp00yn57nkIB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
