> That is Horms-versioning. He starts version numbers at 0 instead of

I was questioning the "exactly one release which hasn't been touched
in 14 months", rather than the actual number; it is a general rule
that the first public exposure of something is *not* good enough for
real use, and I find it hard to imagine 14 months going by without any
fixes or improvements (or, frankly, security issues, it is a network
tool :-)

Thanks for the further references.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to