On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:12:12AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 02:09, Colin Watson wrote: > > I'm currently in the process of filing bugs on those packages in > > unstable that still depend on libpgsql2.1 rather than libpgsql2, or > > upgrading bugs to grave where they'd already been filed. Since the > > versions in woody all appear to be fine, I'm making sure all these bugs > > get tagged 'sid' so that they don't affect the release. > > > > I hope this will help the new postgresql to get into testing a little > > more quickly. > > There was quite a serious upstream bug with postgresql 7.1.3: after a > crash it was possible for sequences to go backwards. This has been > cured in 7.2.1 and it is highly desirable that that version be in > woody. Perhaps we should be filing RC bugs against the woody versions > of these packages?
If the problem is in postgresql, it sounds like the most appropriate thing to do is to file a serious bug against postgresql, tagged 'woody', rather than adjusting the bugs on the packages using it. I guess I (or somebody more experienced with postgresql) should start NMUing fairly soon. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
