On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:05:45AM -0500, David Starner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:54:40PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> > I don't know. Call me an optimist, but I seem to be hearing a rough > > consensus. > > [...] And you, and another group of people, see to think that Debian > should distribute non-software that doesn't have to modifieable. I think nobody says (or at least means) that documentation don't need to be modifiable at all. What is meant is that exactly what the GFDL says: | A "Secondary Section" [...] contains nothing that could fall directly | within that overall subject. (For example, if the Document is in part | a textbook of mathematics, a Secondary Section may not explain any | mathematics.) [...] | | The "Invariant Sections" are certain Secondary Sections [...] Invariant sections are thought for greeting, (non-technical) forewords, motivation chapters and the like. It seems to be consensus that documents with too many or too large invariant sections are non-free. (As an example see the GConf API reference at developer.gnome.org.) - Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
