On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 12:12:47PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 06:14, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > > people, i just want to remember you that DFSG stands for debian free > > SOFTWARE guidelines. documentation is *not* software > > Unfortunately this is becoming less true. CSS contains statements for
Whatcha mean "becoming"? Lispers have been blurring the line between data and code for the last half-century. My package, apt-dpkg-ref, is a document written in Common Lisp that outputs LaTeX and HTML. It's released under the GPL currently, but I briefly considered the FDL and decided that I really couldn't call it entirely a document. (Also I wanted to avoid all the hairy license issues that seem to be arising now). > content generation and counting variables. Is this a program? I'm not > sure, but it's definitely not just a document anymore. XSLT can be > included as "documentation" (and probably is in a lot of places, in or > outside of Debian), and XSLT is Turing-complete. Where does the line get > drawn? Is it possible to draw one? -- ; Matthew Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; OpenPGP public key: C24B6010 on keyring.debian.org ; Signed or encrypted mail welcome. ; "There is no dark side of the moon really; matter of fact, it's all dark." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
