On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:17:02PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Yes, of course. It only says a newer version is in sid, and that it will
> be considered tomorrow.

It also says:

    Depends: galeon mozilla

galeon 1.2.0-2 depends on mozilla-browser (>= 2:0.9.9), which isn't in
testing because:

mozilla (2:0.9.8-2 to 2:0.9.9-4)
    Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    3 days old (needed 2 days)
    out of date on hppa: libnspr-dev, libnspr4, libnss-dev, libnss3, mozilla, 
mozilla-browser, mozilla-chatzilla, mozilla-dev, mozilla-dom-inspector, 
mozilla-js-debugger, mozilla-mailnews, mozilla-psm, mozilla-xmlterm (from 
2:0.9.9-3)
    out of date on m68k: libnspr-dev, libnspr4, libnss-dev, libnss3, mozilla, 
mozilla-browser, mozilla-chatzilla, mozilla-dev, mozilla-dom-inspector, 
mozilla-js-debugger, mozilla-mailnews, mozilla-psm, mozilla-xmlterm (from 
2:0.9.9-3)
    out of date on sparc: libnspr-dev, libnspr4, libnss-dev, libnss3, mozilla, 
mozilla-browser, mozilla-chatzilla, mozilla-dev, mozilla-dom-inspector, 
mozilla-js-debugger, mozilla-mailnews, mozilla-psm, mozilla-xmlterm (from 
2:0.9.9-3)
    mozilla (source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, m68k, powerpc, s390, sparc) is 
buggy! (1 > 0)
    Not considered

In other words, it's currently mostly mozilla that's broken, not galeon.
I guess that if mozilla is fixed then galeon may be able to get in
during the few days' window aj referred to.

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to