On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 03:05:41PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My objection is simply that while there is a need for an available > SMTP server, there is no need for it to be local. I'm going to look > into some alternatives and post a recommendation.
Mutt does not speak SMTP. A remote server won't do it any good at all, thus the dependency on mail-transfer-agent. Neither does mailx, if I remember correctly... thus it also needs the dependency. -- Marc Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpyG2pVK6BVV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
