also sprach Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1859 +0100]: > That would be completely inconsistent with all other Postfix > installations out there and rather non-obvious when you try and look it > up in the common case where only Postfix is installed.
[also answering dominik's post] okay, but how then would you do it? a new section like 8postfix or so would be almost too progressive, and i am not sure if mandb can just handle that... > > i'll file a bug... and should this bug go against postfix only, or also > > postfix-tls? as i understand, postfix-tls is sort of an offspring of > > postfix and thus should be fixed automagically the next time the > > maintainer apt-gets source postfix, applies the patch, and > > dpkg-buildpackages... > > Well, I guess a bug against postfix-tls might prompt a more rapid > update. it's been fixed, according to lamont, in the unstable package. maybe he'll post how he did it, if not, i will as soon as i got an answer from him. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] "no, 'eureka' is greek for 'this bath is too hot.'" -- dr. who
pgpQBZFX5An3p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
