Previously Dominik Kubla wrote: > Oh yes it is. That's why 0.3.3 was bumped to 1.0: because it is mature > and stable software. 0.3.3 implies otherwise.
We don't do marketing, we do a good and stable free software distribution. > BTW: 0.3.3/1.0 fixed quite some bugs over the 0.1.x series so an update > is also mandated by pure technical arguments. Not to mention that it > was hardened considerably against attacks (all daemons do now support > tcpwrappers!) and is necessary if you want to do NFS over TCP (which > needs an additional kernel patch but you can expect that to be merged > for 2.4.18). Adding tcpwrapper support is not the same hardening. If you known of real and serious bugs that are present in stable feel free to file a bugreport, since that would be the only and only reasons to update the package. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
