On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 04:34:31PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote: > On 01-09-25 Steve Greenland wrote: > > I am so tired of hearing things like this. Nobody is forcing anyone to > > do anything. We already "force" them to use 2.2 instead of still using > > 2.0. You want the functionality, you use the right tools. You want to > > Were exactly do we force them? Which debian packages do not work well > with a 2.0.x kernel?
apt-cache search usb for example. > > stick with 2.2, then *you* deal with the issues. The maintainers have > That's a nice attitude, which will lead to the situation that > people, especially administrators, will move away from debian to either > other distributions, a bsd flavour or other free operating systems. Forcing new users to deal with historic burden is not an answer. Use a old kernel - loose features. I really can't understand your problem with limiting chroot bind9 feature to kernels with --bind mounts support. They still can run bind9 perfectly, although less securely. If 2.2 kernel users want chrooted bind, they a) have already done it - no extra work b) upgrade to 2.4 - sheez, that was hard... c) do it manually - no more work than it is now who the hell has to do more work, if we add *support* for *automaticly* running bind9 in chroot jail if the kernel supports --bind mounts? -- Riku Voipio | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | kirkkonummentie 33 | +358 40 8476974 --+-- 02140 Espoo | | Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. |
